Shivaanya Publications maintains a robust peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of the research published in our journals. We employ a single-blind peer review model, where the identities of the reviewers are known to the editorial team but kept confidential from the authors. This transparent and rigorous process involves several key stages, each of which plays a vital role in evaluating manuscripts and determining their suitability for publication.
Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by our editorial team to assess their alignment with the journal’s scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical standards. Submissions meeting these criteria proceed to the peer review stage, while those that do not may be returned to authors for revisions or declined.
The handling editor assigns suitable reviewers to evaluate each manuscript based on their expertise, experience, and absence of conflicts of interest. Reviewers may include members of the journal’s editorial board, invited experts, or other qualified individuals with relevant subject matter expertise.
Reviewers conduct a thorough assessment of the manuscript, evaluating its significance, originality, methodology, results, interpretation, and overall quality. They provide constructive feedback, suggestions for improvement, and recommendations regarding the manuscript’s suitability for publication. Reviewers also assess ethical considerations, such as potential conflicts of interest, ethical conduct of research, and compliance with ethical guidelines.
Reviewers are asked to provide an overall recommendation regarding the manuscript’s acceptance, revision, or rejection based on their evaluation. Their comments and recommendations are considered by the handling editor in making an informed decision about the manuscript.
The handling editor considers the reviewers’ comments, recommendations, and their own assessment to make a decision on the manuscript. Possible editorial decisions include acceptance, acceptance with minor revisions, acceptance with major revisions, resubmission for further review, or rejection.
Authors are promptly informed of the editorial decision, along with the reviewers’ comments and recommendations. In cases of revision or resubmission, authors are provided with clear instructions for addressing the reviewers’ feedback and revising the manuscript.
Revised manuscripts undergo a second round of evaluation by the handling editor and, if necessary, by the original reviewers. Reviewers assess the authors’ responses to their feedback and evaluate the adequacy of the revisions made.
Based on the revised manuscript and reviewers’ evaluations, the handling editor makes a final decision on acceptance or rejection. Accepted manuscripts proceed to the production stage for copyediting, typesetting, and publication.
Shivaanya Publications adheres to ethical guidelines and standards, including those outlined by COPE, ICMJE, and other relevant organizations. Editors and reviewers handle manuscripts with integrity, objectivity, and confidentiality, and disclose any conflicts of interest or ethical concerns.
We acknowledge the valuable contributions of reviewers to the peer review process and provide recognition through acknowledgment in published articles and certificates of review. We also offer ongoing training and resources to reviewers to enhance their skills and expertise in peer review.
Shivaanya Publications regularly evaluates and refines its peer review processes to enhance efficiency, transparency, and fairness. Feedback from authors, reviewers, and editors is solicited and considered for improving the peer review system, ensuring that we uphold the highest standards of peer review in scholarly publishing.
We strive to ensure diversity and inclusion in the peer review process by inviting reviewers from diverse backgrounds, disciplines, and geographic regions. We value diverse perspectives and expertise, which enriches the quality and objectivity of our peer review process.
Shivaanya Publications is committed to ensuring timely and efficient peer review, aiming to provide authors with prompt feedback on their submissions. We monitor review timelines closely and work to minimize delays in the peer review process.
We have established policies and procedures to manage conflicts of interest among reviewers, authors, and editors. Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and steps are taken to ensure impartiality and fairness in the review process.
We prioritize transparency and accountability in our peer review processes, providing authors with clear information about the review timeline, criteria, and decisions. We are committed to upholding the integrity and credibility of our publications through transparent and accountable peer review practices.
Share this:
